When the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) last week revoked the EU trade mark registration for the mark ‘BIG MAC', following a challenge brought by an Irish fast-food chain, SUPERMAC'S, it was hailed by the media as a triumph for a small business in its dispute with a much stronger rival, the well-known McDonald's burger chain. But the decision in this non-use revocation case had nothing to do with the applicant's business. It was entirely down to the evidence of use filed by McDonald's in defence of its registration. According to the EUIPO, it was simply insufficient to establish genuine use of ‘BIG MAC' in the EU.
The Cancellation Division's decision suggests that a fair amount of evidence of use was in fact filed by the trade mark owner. The decision mentions three affidavits signed by McDonald's representatives in the UK, France and Germany, providing sales figures of ‘Big Mac' burgers in the relevant countries over the period in question. It also mentions a range of documentary evidence including samples of packaging materials, promotional brochures and menus displaying the mark, print-outs from McDonald's national websites from across the EU, and print-outs from Wikipedia.
Price Of A Big Mac
The Giga Big Mac has four beef patties instead of the regular two on the Big Mac-and has 2.8 times more meat. Version, Japan's Big Mac is also layered with cheese, lettuce, onion.
It is important to emphasise that the non-use challenge in this case did not focus on any of the finer aspects of the use of the BIG MAC mark. The decision did not examine the issue whether the evidence showed use of the word mark at issue as opposed to any device marks; nor did it go into much detail as to the food products (in classes 29 and 30) and restaurant franchise services (in class 42) for which the mark was registered – the registration was revoked for all goods and services, even for burger sandwiches (and despite the applicant's own concession that the evidence was sufficient in relation to that class of goods); nor did the decision focus on the question of the geographical extent of the use of the mark across the EU – sales figures, after all, were provided for the largest three markets in the EU, which normally ought to be sufficient.
There Is A Big Mac For That Makes
The Cancellation Division found the evidence to be lacking essentially because it took the materials with a great pinch of salt. The evidence of the affiants which provided figures of sales was heavily discounted as evidence of company representatives who are treated by the EUIPO as not independent witnesses whose evidence is inherently unreliable.
In the documentary or physical evidence, the EUIPO found little (at least not enough) to indicate the time, place and extent of the use of the mark. Although at least some of the evidence appears to have been dated and the websites were national sites of EU member states, there was not enough according to the EUIPO to establish the scope and extent of use. The decision points out that the evidence contained 'no confirmation of any commercial transactions, either online, or via brick-and-mortar operations'. In relation to online sources, it states that print-outs from websites showed no proof that the sites had any visitors which could establish the connection between the websites and the number of items (BIG MACs) sold. 'The mere presence of a trade mark on a website is, of itself, insufficient to prove genuine use unless the website also shows the place, time and extent of use'. In relation to Wikipedia, the decision dismissed the site as unreliable.
There's A Big Mac For That
- Egypt's is also the cheapest Big Mac in the world, incidentally, priced at just $1.46 USD. Sweden, where everything is expensive (except healthcare), has the most expensive Big Mac in the world, at a whopping $5.40 per sandwich! A snapshot below of global Big Mac economics.
- 1 day ago Get the macOS Big Sur look on your Apple Mac ahead of its official release date MACBOOK and iMac users are still waiting patiently for news on Apple's macOS Big Sur release but there is a.
Big Mac Ingredients
The decision proclaims that the result was due 'not to an excessively high standard of proof, but to the fact that the EUTM proprietor chose to restrict the evidence submitted'. Be that as it may, whether or not this case survives an appeal, it should serve as a warning sign. As shown repeatedly over the past few years, the EUIPO is prepared to closely scrutinise evidence of use in revocation cases as well as in cases of acquired distinctiveness. Proprietors who are required to produce evidence of genuine use have to ensure their evidence is comprehensive and persuasive and based on independent documentary materials.
There are no set rules as to the type of evidence that can be used to establish genuine use of a mark in the EU. Sales figures can be provided through a witness evidence, but it has to be supported by independent documentary evidence, such as samples of receipts or purchase orders, audited accounts, or independent third party market share reports (in each case, related to the mark in question). Evidence from online sources and social media channels can be valuable but should be supplemented by independent reports showing volumes of visits, hits and search engine searches. Website and app ranking tables can also be relevant. It is important in each case to demonstrate that the evidence relates to the relevant period and to the relevant geographical area and of course that it relates to the relevant goods and services for which the mark is registered.
Price Of A Big Mac
The Giga Big Mac has four beef patties instead of the regular two on the Big Mac-and has 2.8 times more meat. Version, Japan's Big Mac is also layered with cheese, lettuce, onion.
It is important to emphasise that the non-use challenge in this case did not focus on any of the finer aspects of the use of the BIG MAC mark. The decision did not examine the issue whether the evidence showed use of the word mark at issue as opposed to any device marks; nor did it go into much detail as to the food products (in classes 29 and 30) and restaurant franchise services (in class 42) for which the mark was registered – the registration was revoked for all goods and services, even for burger sandwiches (and despite the applicant's own concession that the evidence was sufficient in relation to that class of goods); nor did the decision focus on the question of the geographical extent of the use of the mark across the EU – sales figures, after all, were provided for the largest three markets in the EU, which normally ought to be sufficient.
There Is A Big Mac For That Makes
The Cancellation Division found the evidence to be lacking essentially because it took the materials with a great pinch of salt. The evidence of the affiants which provided figures of sales was heavily discounted as evidence of company representatives who are treated by the EUIPO as not independent witnesses whose evidence is inherently unreliable.
In the documentary or physical evidence, the EUIPO found little (at least not enough) to indicate the time, place and extent of the use of the mark. Although at least some of the evidence appears to have been dated and the websites were national sites of EU member states, there was not enough according to the EUIPO to establish the scope and extent of use. The decision points out that the evidence contained 'no confirmation of any commercial transactions, either online, or via brick-and-mortar operations'. In relation to online sources, it states that print-outs from websites showed no proof that the sites had any visitors which could establish the connection between the websites and the number of items (BIG MACs) sold. 'The mere presence of a trade mark on a website is, of itself, insufficient to prove genuine use unless the website also shows the place, time and extent of use'. In relation to Wikipedia, the decision dismissed the site as unreliable.
There's A Big Mac For That
- Egypt's is also the cheapest Big Mac in the world, incidentally, priced at just $1.46 USD. Sweden, where everything is expensive (except healthcare), has the most expensive Big Mac in the world, at a whopping $5.40 per sandwich! A snapshot below of global Big Mac economics.
- 1 day ago Get the macOS Big Sur look on your Apple Mac ahead of its official release date MACBOOK and iMac users are still waiting patiently for news on Apple's macOS Big Sur release but there is a.
Big Mac Ingredients
The decision proclaims that the result was due 'not to an excessively high standard of proof, but to the fact that the EUTM proprietor chose to restrict the evidence submitted'. Be that as it may, whether or not this case survives an appeal, it should serve as a warning sign. As shown repeatedly over the past few years, the EUIPO is prepared to closely scrutinise evidence of use in revocation cases as well as in cases of acquired distinctiveness. Proprietors who are required to produce evidence of genuine use have to ensure their evidence is comprehensive and persuasive and based on independent documentary materials.
There are no set rules as to the type of evidence that can be used to establish genuine use of a mark in the EU. Sales figures can be provided through a witness evidence, but it has to be supported by independent documentary evidence, such as samples of receipts or purchase orders, audited accounts, or independent third party market share reports (in each case, related to the mark in question). Evidence from online sources and social media channels can be valuable but should be supplemented by independent reports showing volumes of visits, hits and search engine searches. Website and app ranking tables can also be relevant. It is important in each case to demonstrate that the evidence relates to the relevant period and to the relevant geographical area and of course that it relates to the relevant goods and services for which the mark is registered.
Putting together this kind of comprehensive evidence requires an effort. Defending a mark against a non-use challenge can be burdensome. Losing a registration, however, can cause real damage to a business. A trade mark proprietor who is unprepared to muster up the necessary evidence to protect its registration could very well end up finding itself penny-wise and pound-foolish.
Can you get your mouth around this McDonald's Big Mac?
McDonald's Japan is about to supersize one of its most popular burgers.
It's shut down created havoc on the web leading to being searched.Then again, currently the legend Torrent website is working and providing good Seeds for Photoshop torrent. Since users relied on Kickass a lot for all their torrent downloads. Kickass is one of the oldest torrent websites which have been taken down more often, yet it springs up on the web regardless of its shutdowns. Adobe photoshop windows 7 torrent.
The Giga Big Mac has four beef patties instead of the regular two on the Big Mac--and has 2.8 times more meat.
Like the U.S. version, Japan's Big Mac is also layered with cheese, lettuce, onion, pickles, a special mayonnaise-based sauce, mustard and sweet relish.
There Is A Big Mac For That Looks
McDonald's says the new sandwich is a great choice for diners seeking 'a satisfied sense of accomplishment,' reports Japan's RocketNews24.
Of course, a giant sandwich calls for equally monstrous sides. McDonald's will also be rolling out 'grand-size' soft drinks and French fries, both of which are larger than the largest sizes currently offered at the chain.
Download lightroom adobe for mac windows 10. If you don't think your mouth will open wide enough to fit a Giga burger, McDonald's is also rolling out a less dramatic looking Grand Big Mac that has two extra-large beef patties.
Though impressive, the Giga Big Mac has been tested before. In 2014, the chain rolled out a Mega Big Mac-- a Big Mac with four patties-- in several countries including Turkey, Ireland, South Korea and Japan. In the U.S., meat-loving customers can order double meat patties on a regular Big Mac
The Giga Big Mac goes on sale April 6 and will be available for a limited time through the end of the month.
